Leaders from ten national NGOs, along with a delegation of people seeking asylum and community members, gathered at Parliament House 18 June 2018 to implore the Australian Government to stop cuts that will lead to a humanitarian crisis in our communities.
The Turnbull government is cutting life-saving supports, including basic financial assistance and torture and trauma counselling, for people seeking asylum who have been waiting for years for decisions on their refugee claims.
Over 13,000 people nationally, including families with children, are at risk of losing all income support and are at risk of being left homeless and hungry.
“A preventable humanitarian crisis looms in our communities across Australia: this Government-created crisis will see people in our neighbourhoods, schools and communities thrown on to the streets, said Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA) CEO, Paul Power.
“This calculated cruelty denies people seeking asylum living in our community their basic human rights and dignity. It goes against everything that Australia stands for: the fair go, an egalitarian society, decency and dignity for all.”
As people seeking asylum cannot access mainstream support services, the Status Resolution Support Service (SRSS) program provides them with a basic safety net of support. The service includes fortnightly payments (89% of Newstart, less than $35 a day) and casework support. Under the changes, people on SRSS who have the right to work and do not meet a very high threshold of vulnerability will be exited from the program, losing all financial support. This will happen even if they are unemployed, and they will not be given further assistance to find work.
Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS) CEO, Cassandra Goldie, said that these cuts will devastate communities.
“The government is cutting off the sole source of income for thousands of people seeking asylum. People will lose their housing, their ability to feed their families, and will be forced to access emergency relief.
“The Australian Government has a responsibility to ensure that everyone has access to a minimum level of income if they are in need. Removing SRSS from people seeking asylum shirks this responsibility. This is a human rights issue and we urge the government to reverse this decision to ensure that individuals and families are not left destitute.”
The number of people eligible for support has reduced dramatically since August 2017, when the Government made changes to the SRSS program without consulting service providers or peak bodies. Many are now coming to organisations who receive no government funding, such as Jesuit Refugee Service.
As its CEO, Carolina Gottardo, said: “We are really struggling to meet the growing demand for safe, affordable, and sustainable housing, but also for basic necessities such as food, clothing, sanitary pads and nappies. While we are all doing the best we can, with the deep impact of these cuts, it’s just not enough. JRS staff and volunteers say it’s like nothing they’ve seen before.”
Director of Communications at The Salvation Army, Brad Halse, says similarly: “We already see a disproportionately high number of people seeking asylum needing to accessing our services across the country. We are therefore greatly concerned that even more will have to do so when these proposed cuts to the SRSS are introduced.
“There is a very real chance that we and other support services will not be able to meet the increased need caused by this proposed change. Put bluntly, it will cause further destitution,” he said.
A significant number of people currently in the SRSS program are likely to be refugees who will remain in Australia for years to come. The changes are forcing already vulnerable people into destitution, particularly when many are likely to become long-term residents of Australia.
One such person is Hadi, who was cut off from the SRSS program in February because he is studying full-time on a scholarship at University in Melbourne.
“It’s important for me to come to speak up about this issue because I want everyone to know the real consequences of the SRSS cuts and I don’t want to see anyone else going through what I went through, he said.
“This policy does not make any sense. Why did they make me choose between studying and surviving? And why did I have to suffer just because I wanted to study?”